Tutorial 8 - PSD and Electromagnet Interfacing
PSD Sensor Calibration
The Eyebot can use Sharp GP2D02 infrared position sensing
device (PSD) to measure the distance between the PSD and an object.
The data sheet for the GP2D02 can be found here.
(Click on Controller -> Controller -> Hardware -> Data Sheets)
The GP2D02 uses the principle of triangulation to estimate
distance. An infrared LED emits a narrow directional beam of light.
When the infrared beam contacts an object, a portion of the light is
absorbed, a portion is scattered and a portion is reflected back towards
the PSD. The light that is reflected back to the PSD is collected through
a lens and focused on a linear CCD (charge-coupled device) array. The
position of the infrared light on the CCD array determines the distance
to the object.
This method of range estimation is useful because it
is not affected by ambient light and is relatively indifferent to the
color of the object being detected.
Figure 1 - PSD Output vs. Object Distance
Figure 1 was taken from the sensor data sheet. Notice
that the PSD has a non-linear output as a function of the distance to
the object. Plus, due to inconsistancies in manufacturing of the sensors,
different PSDs will give different 8-bit values for the same distance
measurement. This can cause confusion when using the PSDs for obstacle
avoidance. Therefore, each PSD must be calibrated to some base scale.
Figure 2 - PSD Geometry
Problem: Different
sensors give different readings for same distance value.
Solution: Calibrate PSD sensors in a desired
range so that each PSD gives equal values for equal distance measurements.
Note that the units of distance (millimeters, inches, etc.) are arbitrary,
but they must remain consistant throughout the calibration routine.
Step 1: Build a model
From the figure above, the relationship between the
reflection angle and the distance to the object is
The data sheet specifies the distance between the lens and the LED
to be 0.02 meters. From Figure 1, we can also deduce that reasonable
range for Z is between 0.1 to 1.0 meters. An ideal plot of the angle
versus the distance to the object is
Figure 3 - Included Angle vs. Distance for Ideal
PSD
One should observe that this curve has the same characteristics
as the curve in Figure 1, however the scaling does not agree.
Step 2: Construct Experiment
The after the mathematical model is derived, the next
step is constructing our calibration experiment. When calibrating a
sensor, one must determine the range in which the sensor should measure.
The PSD sensors aren't accurate at distances closer than approximately
10 cm, therefore this would be an appropriate bottom range. The PSD
sensors are quoted to work at a distance of up to 100 cm, so this would
be an appropriate upper range. One must also decide the number of intermediate
samples to observe, for this experiment a suitable number would be to
sample every 10 cm.
The output relationship of the PSD sensor can be written as
where alpha and beta are the regression coefficients.
These values are unknown, but can be estimated from experimental data.
A suitable method to estimate the values for coefficients is the method
of least squares. The method of least squares finds estimators A and
B that minimize the sum of the squared differences between the actual
data and the estimated response. The sum of the squared differences,
SS is given by the equation
Differentiating with respect to A and B yields
By equating the above partial differential equations to
zero, the following equations can be obtained.
Now rearrange the first equation in terms of A and substitute
into the second. This yields
By rearranging the second equation, the parameter B can
be found. Once B has been calculated, it can be substituted into the
first equation to calculated A.
Step 3: Conduct Experiment
Table 1 - Sample PSD Data
Distance (cm)
|
PSDGetRaw()
|
PSD Output
|
10
|
35
|
220
|
20
|
105
|
150
|
30
|
107
|
148
|
40
|
143
|
112
|
50
|
151
|
104
|
60
|
155
|
100
|
70
|
160
|
95
|
80
|
163
|
92
|
90
|
165
|
90
|
100
|
167
|
88
|
From the data shown in Table 1, the estimators for the regression parameters
are
A = 76.5
B = 14.8
Figure 4 shows the sample data points along with the plot
of theoretical values.
Figure 4 - Experimental and Theoretical Results
Step 4: Implementation (Function vs. Look-up Table)
Now a function has been found that relates the output of the PSD to
the distance to an object. This function will be useful in determining
the distance to an object and can be used for avoidance. If the PSD
readings are taken often, this means that the calculation will have
to also be done quite often. An alternative to computing a value each
time you sample the data is to precalculate all possible values and
store them in an array, often called a look-up table. This file
demonstrates how to compare the computational speed of each method.
One should be aware that this program only provides a rough approximation
of the execution times of each function call and the output will also
depend on the other processes the computer is currently running. Convert
the file so it can be executed on an Eyebot and test the times of each.